ATI TEAS 7
TEAS 7 Reading Practice Test
1. What is the definition of the word 'antediluvian' in the sentence: 'Ermengarde loved spending time with her great-aunt, but she occasionally had to roll her eyes at what she considered to be Aunt Fredericka's antediluvian views about dating and relationships'?
- A. outdated
- B. confusing
- C. hostile
- D. Eager
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The word 'antediluvian' is often used to mean extremely old or outdated, especially in a derogatory sense. In this context, Ermengarde finds her great-aunt's views on dating and relationships to be old-fashioned or out of touch with modern ideas. 'Confusing', 'hostile', and 'Eager' do not accurately capture the meaning of 'antediluvian' in the given context, making them incorrect choices.
2. What is the best definition of economy as it is used in this passage?
- A. Exchange of money, goods, and services
- B. Delegation of household affairs
- C. Efficient money management
- D. Less expensive
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct definition of 'economy' in this passage is 'efficient money management.' The passage emphasizes the importance of expending less than what is earned, which is a key aspect of efficient money management. Choice A, 'Exchange of money, goods, and services,' is too broad and does not capture the essence of the passage. Choice B, 'Delegation of household affairs,' is not directly related to the context of the passage. Choice D, 'Less expensive,' does not encompass the concept of managing money efficiently as discussed in the passage.
3. Which of the following best describes the author's intent in the passage?
- A. to persuade
- B. to entertain
- C. to express feelings
- D. to inform
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The author's intent in the passage is to inform the reader about the historical events surrounding King James II, his family, and the succession of the English throne. The passage provides a detailed account of the lineage, religious affiliations, and the political implications of James II and his descendants. It does not aim to persuade, entertain, or express feelings, but rather presents a factual narrative of historical events. Therefore, choice D, 'to inform,' is the correct answer. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the passage is focused on presenting historical information rather than persuading, entertaining, or expressing emotions.
4. With which of the following statements would the author most likely agree?
- A. There is no real mystery about the Bermuda Triangle because most events have reasonable explanations.
- B. Researchers are wrong to expand the focus of the Triangle to the Azores, as this increases the likelihood of accidents.
- C. The official statement of 'causes or reasons unknown' in the loss of the Navy planes was a deliberate concealment from the Navy.
- D. Reducing the legends about the mysteries of the Bermuda Triangle will help to reduce the number of reported accidents or shipping losses in the region.
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The author would most likely agree with the statement that reducing the legends about the mysteries of the Bermuda Triangle will help to reduce the number of reported accidents or shipping losses in the region. This aligns with the perspective that many events in the Bermuda Triangle can be explained logically and that dispelling myths and legends can lead to a more accurate understanding of the phenomena occurring in the area. Choice A is incorrect because the author acknowledges that the Bermuda Triangle has sparked interest due to unexplained events. Choice B is incorrect as expanding the focus of the Triangle to the Azores is not associated with an increase in accidents, according to the author. Choice C is incorrect as the author does not suggest a deliberate concealment but rather points towards logical explanations for the events in the Bermuda Triangle.
5. Which of the following is not a reliable resource for a research paper?
- A. The New York Times
- B. A personal interview with a politician
- C. A medical journal
- D. Wikipedia
Correct answer: D
Rationale: Wikipedia is not a reliable source for a research paper due to its open editing format, which may lead to inaccuracies, bias, and lack of authority. While it can be a good starting point for research and general information, it is crucial to verify information from Wikipedia with more academic and reputable sources like peer-reviewed journals, books, or official websites. The New York Times, a personal interview with a politician, and a medical journal are generally considered reliable sources for research papers. The New York Times is a reputable newspaper, personal interviews can provide valuable firsthand insights, and medical journals undergo rigorous peer review processes to ensure accuracy and reliability.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$149.99/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$1/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access