ATI TEAS 7
ATI TEAS 7 Reading Practice Test
1. What word best describes the author's attitude toward those who believe they understand money?
- A. Supportive
- B. Incriminating
- C. Excessive
- D. Patronizing
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The author's tone towards those who think they understand money is patronizing, as seen in the statement 'Many of my hearers may say, 'we understand this; this is economy, and we know economy is wealth; we know we can't eat our cake and keep it also.' Yet I beg to say that perhaps more cases of failure arise from mistakes on this point than almost any other.' This conveys a sense of superiority and belittlement, making 'Patronizing' the best word to describe the author's attitude. - Choice A, 'Supportive,' is incorrect as the author is not expressing support but rather a critical view. - Choice B, 'Incriminating,' is incorrect as the author is not accusing or blaming those who believe they understand money. - Choice C, 'Excessive,' is incorrect as it does not capture the author's attitude of looking down on others' understanding of money.
2. According to the advertisement, which of the following is true?
- A. Candidates must have three or more years of litigation experience
- B. Candidates will have small caseloads
- C. Candidates must be members of the California State Bar Association
- D. The position is not currently available
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C. This information is based on the advertisement's specific requirement that candidates must be members of the California Bar Association. The job description clearly states, 'Candidates must be members in Good Standing of the California Bar Association.' This indicates that a valid license to practice law in California is a mandatory qualification for the position advertised. Choices A, B, and D are incorrect because there is no mention in the advertisement of candidates needing three or more years of litigation experience, having small caseloads, or the position not being currently available.
3. According to the passages, which situation would not constitute an illegal use of lethal force?
- A. A disgruntled cashier yells obscenities at a customer.
- B. A thief is seen running away with stolen cash.
- C. A man is attacked in an alley by another man with a knife.
- D. A woman punches another woman in a bar.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is C because, according to the passage, lethal force may be legally used in self-defense or to protect others from imminent danger. In the situation where a man is attacked in an alley by another man with a knife, the use of lethal force to defend oneself would not constitute an illegal act. Choices A, B, and D do not involve a situation where the use of lethal force in self-defense would be justified, making them incorrect. A disgruntled cashier yelling obscenities, a thief running away with stolen cash, and a woman punching another woman do not present imminent danger that would justify the use of lethal force.
4. What word best describes the organization of this passage?
- A. Modeling
- B. Hypothesizing
- C. Explaining
- D. Observing
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The correct answer is 'Explaining.' The passage is structured in an explanatory manner, providing a detailed account of how a plunger works. It explains the process step by step, from the initial depression of the plunger to the increase in pressure inside the clogged pipe. 'Modeling' and 'Observing' are not suitable choices as the passage does not involve creating models or direct observations. 'Hypothesizing' is also incorrect as the passage focuses on describing the functioning of a plunger rather than proposing or discussing potential hypotheses.
5. Which of the following most accurately describes how the argument proceeds?
- A. The argument proceeds by stating a conclusion, then providing supporting evidence.
- B. The argument proceeds by stating several facts and drawing a conclusion.
- C. The argument proceeds by offering a premise, then refuting it.
- D. The argument proceeds by making a comparison between two subjects.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct answer is A. The argument in the text proceeds by stating a conclusion ('Dwight is the best employee') and then providing supporting evidence ('The top salesman is always the best employee'). This aligns with choice A, where the argument is structured by stating a conclusion first and then offering supporting evidence. Choices B, C, and D are incorrect because the argument in the text does not simply present facts and draw a conclusion, offer a premise and then refute it, or make a comparison between two subjects.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
ATI TEAS Premium Plus
$150/ 90 days
- Actual ATI TEAS 7 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access
ATI TEAS Basic
$99/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access