HESI A2
HESI A2 Reading Comprehension Practice Test
1. What conclusion can be drawn from the passage on the Amazon Rainforest?
- A. The Amazon Rainforest is shrinking at a rapid pace.
- B. The Amazon Rainforest is not affected by human activity.
- C. The Amazon Rainforest will survive indefinitely.
- D. The Amazon Rainforest has no significant impact on global warming.
Correct answer: A
Rationale: The correct conclusion that can be drawn from the passage on the Amazon Rainforest is that it is shrinking at a rapid pace. The passage explicitly mentions the rapid deforestation and shrinking of the Amazon Rainforest due to human activities like logging and burning. This conclusion is supported by the alarming statistics provided, such as 9,169 square miles of forest being cut down in Brazil in 2003, and an area of rainforest the size of a football field being burned down every minute. This rapid destruction poses a significant threat to the survival of the Amazon Rainforest and its biodiversity. Choice B is incorrect as the passage clearly states that human activities are causing harm to the rainforest. Choice C is incorrect because the passage highlights the current dangers and threats faced by the Amazon Rainforest, indicating that its survival is at risk. Choice D is also incorrect as the passage clearly explains the significant impact of deforestation in the Amazon Rainforest on global warming due to the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
2. Which of the following is not listed as a detail in the passage about Aromatherapy?
- A. Subjects were given mild stressors.
- B. Lemon and lavender scents were tested.
- C. Vanilla worked better than lemon for stress.
- D. The study took place at Ohio State University.
Correct answer: C
Rationale: The passage does not support the idea that vanilla worked better than lemon for stress relief; instead, it focuses specifically on lemon and lavender as the tested scents. The absence of this information regarding vanilla makes C the correct answer, as it is not included in the details provided in the passage.
3. What was the author’s primary purpose for writing this essay?
- A. To persuade the reader to conserve water
- B. To persuade the reader that runoff is not the best way to collect water
- C. To analyze different types of runoff
- D. To inform the reader about the stages of the water cycle
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D. The author's primary purpose for writing the essay is to inform the reader about the stages of the water cycle. The essay discusses the various stages of the water cycle, including precipitation, runoff, evaporation, and condensation. Choices A, B, and C are incorrect because the essay focuses on explaining the water cycle stages rather than persuading the reader to conserve water, discussing the effectiveness of runoff, or analyzing different types of runoff.
4. Choose the best summary of the passage about High Fructose Corn Syrup.
- A. After extensive studies, scientists recommend removing HFCS from grocery products.
- B. A recent study on rats confirms suspicions that HFCS contributes to unhealthful weight gains.
- C. Until more research is done, using HFCS is preferable to replacing it with refined sugar.
- D. Avoiding HFCS can have immediate, healthful results on overweight patients, as suggested by the AMA.
Correct answer: B
Rationale: The best summary of the passage is choice B. The passage discusses concerns about the impact of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) on health, particularly its link to obesity. It mentions a recent study on rats that confirms suspicions about HFCS contributing to unhealthful weight gains. Choices A, C, and D are incorrect as they introduce recommendations or implications not explicitly mentioned in the passage. Choice A goes beyond the information by stating that scientists recommend removing HFCS from grocery products, choice C suggests that using HFCS is preferable until more research is done, and choice D implies immediate healthful results on overweight patients by avoiding HFCS, as suggested by the AMA, which is not supported by the passage.
5. Which is not mentioned as a possible result of being spanked in childhood?
- A. Aggression
- B. Coercive sex
- C. Delinquency
- D. Incontinence
Correct answer: D
Rationale: The correct answer is D: 'Incontinence.' The passage discusses the negative consequences of spanking in childhood, such as increased aggression, delinquent behavior, and future sexual problems like coercive sex. However, incontinence is not mentioned as a possible result of being spanked. Therefore, it is the correct choice. Choices A, B, and C are all supported by the passage, making them incorrect answers.
Similar Questions
Access More Features
HESI A2 Basic
$49/ 30 days
- 3,000 Questions with answers
- 30 days access
HESI A2 Premium
$99/ 90 days
- Actual HESI A2 Questions
- 3,000 questions with answers
- 90 days access